A wrongful celebration

via: Jewish World Review This was originally published on Jewish World Review / January 13, 1999, but the message is still valid today!

(JWR) —- (http://www.jewishworldreview.com) SCARCELY A DAY GOES BY without a reference to preparations for the new millennium.

First, what’s a millennium, anyway? A millennium is a period of 1,000 years. Does the next millennium start at the beginning of next year (2000) at the stroke of midnight? Most people think it does, and they’re wrong.

Here’s how to think about when the new — third — millennium starts.

Pretend I owe you $3,000, and I’m counting them out to you one dollar at a time, and I get up to $1,997, $1,998 $1,999. Now the question is: When have I finished counting out the second thousand dollars and begin on the next — third — thousand dollars? I don’t start counting out the next thousand dollars until after I add another one dollar to that $1,999 that I’ve already given you, making the total $2,000. I start counting out the next one thousand dollars when I’ve given you $2001.

This reasoning also applies to counting years. The second millennium does not end in 1999, and the third does not begin in 2000. The second millennium ends midnight, Dec. 31, 2000, and the third millennium starts immediately afterward, in the year 2001.

All around the world, there are massive plans in place to celebrate the next millennium (and 21st century) when 1999 expires. I’m not the only one aware of the mistake. There must be people in the major news network like ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN who will read this column and are intelligent enough to understand the mistake.

Moreover, they have the means to get the word out. To combat public and official ignorance about the new millennium, the evening news should end with a statement like, “That’s it for tonight, in the next to the last year of the second millennium.” School boards could order teachers to explain the error to America’s precious children. Why won’t they?

If people discovered that the new millennium begins in 2001 rather than 2000, would they cancel all the plans they are making now to celebrate and welcome in next year as the new millennium? Some of the plans are gigantic and costly. Some airlines plan to have flights over the international date line so passengers can experience the “new millennium” twice. New York City is coughing up mega-bucks for a megaton crystal ball to replace the current one that has been descending on New Year’s Eve. Web sites around the world, including one at the White House, have clocks counting down the “last” days, hours and minutes left in the second millennium. The United States is not the only country with costly celebration plans.

I suspect there will be no efforts to cancel plans for next year’s celebration in light of the error being made known. In fact, I suspect that some people will be downright angry at the suggestion that they’re celebrating nothing but the start of another year and not the new millennium. How do we explain this? Let me speculate.

The math error might be explained by the fact it’s the first time in anybody’s life that all numbers change at year-end instead of only one or two, as it has been all of our lives. My second explanation is not as flattering. That is, people believe that the new millennium starts next year. Despite evidence to the contrary, they want to hold on to their beliefs simply because that’s what they believe and it’s better that way.

Let me propose a middle ground. Keep the celebration plans, but call it celebrations for the last year of a century that featured mankind’s greatest achievements as well as his unparalleled brutality.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s